सुधर्मा Sudharma

2021-06-02 00:17:42



In this Video Acharya clearly says if Yajnopavita not done or done after time limit, 'शास्त्रीय परम्परा के अनुसार उसे ब्राह्मण क्षत्रिय वैश्य नहीं कह सकते'
We cannot call him a Brahmana Kshatriya Vaishya.

Bloodline or no Bloodline, the point is not about bloodline importance here. Main question is "Can Bloodline Determine Varna"? No. Because even with bloodline he is not Brahmana without lineage of Samskaras in Paternal Ancestry.

He shared Raghavacharya ji's video talking रक्तशुद्बि but that was from a video where His Holiness is Generalizing रोटी बचाओ और खून बचाओ, and explaining to mass in simple language. Even taking Daan from some adharmi would mean inheriting his Gunas and Karmas, so is taking food or blood from unauthorized guy, impurity still isn't physical but abt imbalance in Gunas.

Still I haven't denied same bloodline in Varnas and also can be said to not do intermarriage. But pt is can blood determine Varna? No ओपन / कमेंट

2021-06-01 16:40:41 . The Sons of Vishvamitra should be Kshatriya by this Gene Theory because they don't have the Brahmana Genes now.

If you emphasize so much over Genes Blood or DNA, you're making a fool of yourself. This is Pseudo-science as the Old Darwinian Model has long been rejected. This is Epic eg of Raitahood, similar to what dimwits speak of Radiations in Mandir Bells, Downward flow in Period Blood and what not. I dont deny Biological Benefits of not marrying in Same Gotra or having similar occupation and similar Genes and similar bloodline. What I explain is that these Physical Traits aren't a Parameter to Determine Varna. Because there are many Shaastriya Methods to have a different bloodline still inherit Varna in previous Yugas.

The reason why today Intervarna marriage is denied isn't due to Physical Gene Maintainance or maintaining Bloodline, it is the imbalance of Gunas (Sattva rajas tamas) which will take place if you intermarry and produce. Such imbalance could be avoided in Previous Yugas due to Tapas of Brahmanas. Today they dont have such Tapas and powers, so imbalance in Non-physical Gunas would create progeny with mixed Gunas. Such imbalance of Gunas would prevent Varna to flow in future Generations and make you Unauthorized for Upanayana.

Follow @Sudharma_108 ओपन / कमेंट

2021-06-01 16:40:41 Message from Sanskritmemes

"How does Varna flow in Lineage? I Will answer the last time and debunk all the neo wannabe Trads. This concept which I speak of is a Universally accepted one and is unquestioned by any traditional school.

Jati means that which percieved through Aakriti, like Treeness (jati) in trees can be percieved through Akriti (figure of tree like branches leaves etc). But Brahmanas and Shudras have same External Aakriti, so in a group of humans we can't determine who's brahmana and who isn't. The internal characteristics can be Genes, blood, Dna etc if are to be considered Aakriti in case of Brahmanhood or Kshatriyahood, Still there is no guarantee that all these even though are present in a body, would 100% determine Varna.

Note= I dont deny common genetics and bloodline to be found in Same Varnas but i deny that they can be used as valid parameters to determine Varna or the flow of Varna to the next generation. Different methods according to different Yugas determine Varna, and its flow and its only the Shaastras which decide. It defies all logic.

The reason is simple, there is ban on Intervarna marriages today, but in Previous Yugas Brahmanas did marry a lower Varna woman 2nd or 3rd time. When it was allowed, the progeny obtained the paternal Varna. Now there is Bloodmixing and Genemixing as well, but he got the Varna of Father. And was eligible for Shraaddhas (ancestral rites) also. Now let's see if a Brahmana born of Pure Brahmana Parents with no intermixing in Clan, will he obtain Brahmanhood at birth for guarantee? Not necessarily.

If the parent has not had an Upanayana (janeu), then the Son would be a Vraatya. If such Upanayana stops till more than 6-7 generations in Lineage, than the Progeny would be Shudra. Manu 10.43 shows how Kshatriya families due to lack of rituals became Shudras in due course of time.

Today, all kinds of Intervarna are banned, and if you say the reason is Genes etc, why where they allowed previously? Varna passes down only through Samskaras. Hence its proved Varna isn't a physical quality nor can it be determined through anything like Genes or Dna. The flow of Varna is through Unbroken Samskaras in a Lineage. If I do not undergoe Upanayana at time, and do not have Prayashchitta, my son won't inherit Brahmanhood at birth. The Garbhadhana also is a Samskara which depends on the Parents' Samskaras. And through these Samskaras the born child can be considered as a Brahmana.

You can ask me Why Lineage is Important, but not Bloodline. Because Lineage just means Parampara, an Unbroken Chain. Lineage hence doesnt qualify as Bloodline. Unbroken Chain of what? = Samskaras. भागवत 7.11.13 says संस्कारा यदविच्छिन्ना स द्विजः (where Samskaras are unbroken, he is a Dvija). So birth is indeed important, but in such a family, where all generations have undergone Upanayana/Janeu. Even if one generation has not done Janeu, the child will be born a Vraatya (Potential Brahmana). Even Janma requires Garbhadhana Samskara. Mating too has proper procedure to follow.

Aapastamba hence says अथयस्य प्रापितामह आदि नानुस्मार्यत।
उपनयनम् ते शमशानसमस्तुताः।। "And those who's ancestors' intiation/janeu is not conducted, those offsprings are equivalent to graveyards" . Bhagavata Purana says that Uninitiated Dvijas or Dvijabandhus cannot even Hear Vedas = स्त्रीशूद्रद्विजबन्धूनां त्रयी न श्रुतिगोचरा, Skanda Purana says जन्मना जायते शूद्रः = Everyone is born equivalent to a Shudra (ie unauthorized in Vedas). This proves Birth has no Purity, Purity is only through Samskaras.

Gautama gave birth to a Shudra, whom he converted to a Brahmana by his Tapas, and his Clan is the Gautama Gotra of Brahmanas, having blood and genes of a Shudra. In Mahabharata, Brahmanas have said to have Niyoga with Kshatriya women and produce Kshatriyas, these should ideally be Sankaras due to mixture, but are not. They get Kshatriya and Brahmana both genes/blood still are Pure Kshatriyas. As Varna isn't Phsyical or obtained through Physical Means but Divine Samskaras. संस्काराद् द्विज उच्यते (Skanda Purana, Atri ओपन / कमेंट

2021-06-01 16:40:05 Passage of Varna - Through Samskaras or Genetics? ओपन / कमेंट

2021-05-27 19:28:05 Feminism and Patriarchy

Patriarchy empowers women by encouraging them to embrace their femininity and perform their natural tendencies like belongedness, taking care of family etc, this lets them glow and blossom.

The Divine Feminine and The Divine Masculine are called Prakriti and Purusha. Prakriti is the Active Element, which Nourishes, Nurtures. But it needs some Counciousness to function, without this Force called Purusha the divine feminine cannot function. Purusha or The Divine Masculine is the Provider. It provides Conciusness to Prakriti but it has No Action. Hence both are interdependent, and by their Fusion is born entire Nature.

Purusha is the Provider, the one who takes responsibility and Prakriti is the Nourisher, one who takes care of the family, handles all functions and Heals. It is the Active Element which keeps the house cheerful and active, without which there will be only emptiness and no prosperity.

Patriarchy wants both to embrace their natural instincts.

Whereas Feminism wants to weaken and Feminize the man, make an isolated society and break family system, by weakening the Manliness in Men, women start feeling more insecure and then they lose their femininity and take up Masculine Things. This means Stress, Frustration and Depression. They automatically turn on their Defense Mode and become very rigid.

Patriarchy is like the Sunlight which blossoms the flower of Femininity. Women want to feel secured, protected and Cozy in the company of their mate. They are dependent on Men. And Men have a tendency to take risks, and provide, they want to do things for their loved ones voluntarily, like open doors etc. Men too want to enjoy such life for their mate by providing and are dependent on Women. Feminism calls this 'toxic masculinity' and discourages Men to Embrace Masculinity and Women to embrace Femininity.

- follow @sudharma_108 ओपन / कमेंट

2021-05-26 13:13:24 The great caste-less, mahAtma Buddha's deeds explained by Sri Vaishnava friend Perumāḷpicchai Vāsudevan ji
Abandoned wife and child in the middle of the night because he saw a dead man.
Blamed Brahmanas for all problems (literally the entire Majjhima Nikaya)
Called Vedas barren deserts of lies of Brahmanas (Tevijja Sutta).
Called all Brahmanas as evil thieves whom kings must expel from their lands and had his disciple Mahakacchana ask the king of Avanti to do this (Madhura Sutta).
Said anyone and everyone should be taught Vedas to prove one's support for equality in society (Ambatta Sutta).
Said that real Brahmanas are liars and that whomever he calls a Brahmana is only an actual Brahmana (Vasala Sutta and Dhammapada).
Called for the economic boycott of temples, expulsion of anyone practising Shastras for a living from the land, destruction of idols and cleansing of Brahmins (Brahmajaala Sutta).
Copied all the Hindu beliefs from Vedas, recast himself as the supreme being, and said that all Kshatriyas come from his own arms and shoulders (Ashokavadana).
Called Brahmanas as rapists and liars (Tevijja and Agganna Suttas).

Shakya Buddha was smart, he just did not criticise Vedas. He also made Dharma weak by demonizing Brahmanas, that is why Ambedkar chose Buddhism which is equally supportive of another Variant of Caste system full of discrepancies.

Buddhists take pride in Buddhas being born in only Brahmana or Kshatriya lineage. But also abuse the actual Vedic Brahmans and make new fake Brahmanas as preachers. They hijacked temples, unlike Mullas they didnt destroy them, but used temples and Hindu Dieties to attrack Hindu Audience. And made new stories in name of Hindu Dieties to peddle Buddhist concepts to Hindus.

They hijacked temples and universities and Gurukulas and removed brahmanas. They themselves sat on high posts and peddled hate against Vedic Dharma.

Buddha wore and behaved like Brahmanas, chanted Om, wore saffron, and also worshipped Hindu Dieities just for clout. So that he can attract audience and peddle hate against Vedas. Later Buddhists added blasphemous stories to Hindu Dieties and peddled Buddhist theories to Hindus.

Also by posing like Brahmanas they took all jobs and even Bhiksha which Brahmanas used to have. Buddha criticised Hindu Yajnas and Rituals, as superstition and immoral. This was the only source of Income to Brahmanas. And weakened the Kshatriyas by teaching impotency in the name of Ahimsa.

I could go on and on.

Today, this country uses his symbol on its national flag and you wonder why disease, famines, anti-Hindu rulers and assorted Mlecchas roam all over the land unhindered. Today the same country's rulers celebrate Buddha Purnima - the festival whose culminating mark of celebration will be the genocide of Hindus. ओपन / कमेंट

2021-05-14 20:27:55 these sins can happen to anyone born in any lineage. So people who spread such stories about Bhargava Rama have all either lost their Varna statuses (maybe they lost it even prior to committing this evil), or never belonged to the Brahmana or Kshatriya Varnas to even begin with.

Such an avatara as Bhargava Rama, due to its exceptional nature, cannot be worshipped either. Bhargava Rama still walks among us and Kalki Bhagavan will give him darshana when Kaliyuga ends. No human has the right to question the Sankalpa of Bhagavan ever. Those who do so are not Sanatanis any longer and are as good as Mlecchas irrespective of their lineage of birth. For after all, the worst asuras of the Mahabharata were born in the greatest lineages of the time.

Brahmanas and Kshatriyas are each others' protectors. Kshatriyas use their arms to protect Brahmanas and Brahmanas use their penance to ensure the Kshatriya's sins are lost and his Kshatriyatva remains intact. Anyone saying otherwise is against all Varnas, the Vedas and is against Bhagavan Shriman Narayana Himself. To name a few who actually said and believed such things - Duryodhana, Gautama Buddha, Hiranyakashipu.

perumal vasudevan

Follow @Sudharma_108 ओपन / कमेंट

2021-05-14 20:27:55 Bhargava Rama's birth has often eluded people as he is Unique, a Brahmana with the nature of a Kshatriya. He is the Avatara of Vishnu and A Rishi, seer of Mantras in Rigveda 10th Mandala. Son of Rishi Jamadagni and Renuka, he would go on to annihilate all evil Kshatriyas on Earth for 21 times.

Prior to his birth, some things had been ongoing for centuries. Kartaviryarjuna, a king of the Chandravamsha who was an evil tyrant in search of gaining extreme powers to rule all the worlds. Kartavirya once served Rishi Dattatreya selfishly and demanded a boon of him. That boon included a condition that the kind of man that may be able to kill Kartavirya should not have existed earlier, and cannot exist later either.

Chapters 116 of Vanaparva speaks of how Kartavirya went on a terror campaign against every ruler on the Earth and even the Devas who could not defeat him. The Devas prayed to Vishnu only to stop him and Vishnu took a form and did a penance in Badari. At this time, King Gaadhi, father of Vishvamitra, was in Vanavaasa and he had a sister Satyavati by name.

Gadhi's Sister and Vishvamitra's Aunt Satyavati Devi was a very Dharmic woman who was married to Rishi Rchika - a Brahmana of the Bhargava Gotra. Gaadhi, श्याल/साला of Rchika asks Rchika for a boon, it will be good if Rchika's son through his sister that would have the power of 1000 war horses fit for protecting Yajna. Rchika, who was the brother-in-law (जीजा) of Gaadhi, granted this boon.

Now Rchika's father Brahmarishi Bhrgu came from Devaloka and told Rchika to consummate his marriage in a certain way. They made a mistake and hence it was said by Devas that a Kshatriya would be born. Satyavati prayed to Bhrgu, that she only wanted a Brahmana. He heard the prayer and granted her this boon - her son will be a Brahmana but grandson will be a Kshatriya-like Brahmana. So Rchika and Satyavati beget Rishi Jamadagni. And Jamadagni marries Renuka the daughter of Raja Renu and begot Bhargava Rama - as per the delayed condition of the boon Bhrgu gave Satyavati.

Kartavirya Arjuna for the greed of cow, steals cow from Jamadagni. Jamadagni asks Parashurama to kill Kartavirya, who's order he executes. In the absence of Jaamadagnya, the sons of Arjuna kill Jamadagni, father of Rama. Then angered on the Adharma, he kills and 21 times the Evil Kshatriyas. After which till now, he is meditating on Mt Mahendra. The Kshatriyas born after that, some of them where of the same patrilenal clans, but many of them where offsprings of Kshatriya mothers and Brahmana fathers who retained the Kshatriya Varna.

It is true according to the Mahabharata's Vanaparva and Adiparva that so many Kshatrabandhus had died at Bhargava's hands, that many Brahmana sages had to marry Kshatriya princesses and restore many lineages through such Niyoga marriages. Now let us see who reject all this - supremacists who claim to be Brahmanas and their rival supremacists who claim to be Kshatriyas.

One group claims that all Brahmanas can go about murdering people and that Kshatriyas are their slaves, while the other group rejects the existence of Bhargava Rama altogether. Both these groups -

1. Have implied that Vyasa is a liar
2. Have implied that Valmiki is a liar
3. Have implied that Rama and Krishna are liars
4. Have denied the existence of Vishnu's avataras and His boons
5. Have implied that all Vaidika Acharyas of all Sampradayas who accept all of these stories are liars and frauds for doing so.
6. Have denied Niyogavivaaha which the Vedas sanction and thereby have called the Vedas lies.

Krishna clearly tells that those going against the most rudimentary Varnadharma lose their Varna and become avarnas. Which is why He addresses Jarasandha by 'bho' instead of the Kshatriya honorifics. Narada says clearly in all his Upadeshas to Yudhishthira that Sanatana Dharma has no place for atheists and he calls deniers of Vedas and Vedic knowledge as atheists or adharmins of various other kinds. Falling from your Varna by ओपन / कमेंट

2021-05-14 20:24:47 ओपन / कमेंट

2021-05-09 14:48:46 #शास्त्रोंमें_मातृगौरव

श्रीराम!
संसार में जितने भी वन्द्य गुरुजन हैं उन सबकी अपेक्षा माता परमगुरु होनेसे अधिक वन्दनीया होती हैं।

शास्त्रों में तो यहाँ तक लिखा है कि माताकी गरिमा हजार पिता से भी अधिक है।सारे जगत् में वन्दनीय सन्यासी को भी माताकी वन्दना प्रयत्न पूर्वक करनी चाहिए।--
#गुरोर्हि_वचनम्प्राहुर्धर्म्यं_धर्मज्ञसत्तम।
#गुररूणां_चैव_सर्वेषां_माता_परमों_गुरुः।
*महा.भा. आदि प. १९५--१६*--हे धर्मज्ञ सत्तम!
गुरुजनों की आज्ञा का पालन धर्म्य होता है,किन्तु माता सभी गुरुओंमें परम गुरु होती है।
#सहस्रन्तुपितॄन्मातागौरवेणातिरिच्यते ।
#सर्ववन्द्येन_यतिना_प्रसूर्वन्द्या_प्रयत्नतः।
*स्कन्द पु.काशीख.११-५०*।

माता शिशुको गर्भमें धारण करने उत्पन्न करने में तथा पालन करने में अत्यधिक कष्ट उठाती है। शिशु के लिए अपनी रूचि और आहार विहार का भी त्याग करती है। इसी लिए माता का गौरव अधिक कहा गया है। पिता आदि यदि पतित हो जाएं तो उनका त्याग किया जा सकता है परंतु माता का नहीं। माता पिता में विवाद होने पर पुत्र को चुप रहना चाहिये ,अत्यधिक आवश्यक हो तो माताके अनुकूल ही बोले ऐसा शास्त्र कहते हैं--
#पतितः_गुरवः_त्याज्या_माता_नैव_कथञ्चन।
#गर्भधारणपोषाभ्यां_तेभ्योमातागरीयसी।। *मत्स्य पु २२६--१८७.*

#न_मातापित्रोः_अन्तरं_गच्छेत्_पुत्रः।।
#कामं_मातुरेव_ब्रूयात्।--(शङ्ख लिखित स्मृति)

माताको सर्वाधिक गौरव देना उचित ही है। इसे प्रगट करनेके लिए ही व्याकरण शास्त्रमें मातापिता ऐसा ही शुद्ध माना जाता है न कि पितामाता।
शास्त्रोंके इन वचनोंमें ध्यान देनेसे यह स्पष्ट होजाताहै कि ऋषियोंने स्त्री को दासी नहीं परम पूज्य मानाहै। अतः जो लोग यह आक्षेप करते हैं कि ऋषि पुरुषवादी मानसिकताके कारण स्त्रियोंको पैरकीजूती मानते हैं , भोग्या मात्र समझा गया है, उनका यह आक्षेप निराधार ही है।
शास्त्रकारोंने #स्त्रीको_पुरुषके_बराबर_ही_नहीं_अधिक_श्रेष्ठ कहा है--देखिए गोस्वामी जी क्या कहते हैं--
#जो_केवल_पितु_आयसु_ताता।
#तौ_जनि_जाहु_जानि_बडि_माता।
यदि कहा जाये कि यहाँ तो माता को ही बड़ी कहा है न कि स्त्रीको तो यह ठीक नहीं मनुस्मृति आदि में तो स्त्री मात्र को कहागया है-- #यत्र_नार्यस्तु_पूज्यन्ते_रमन्ते_तत्र_देवताः। #यत्रैतास्तु_न_पूज्यन्ते_सर्वास्तत्र_विफला_क्रियाः।(मनु.३--५६/अनुसाशन प.४६--५/विष्णुधर्मोत्तर पु.३-२३३-१०६) ---
जहाँ स्त्रियां पूजित होतीं हैं वहां देवता प्रशन्नता पूर्वक निवास करते हैं, जहाँ ऐसा नहीं होता वहां की सभी धार्मिक क्रियाएं निष्फल होती हैं।अब कोई यह कह दे कि यह तो स्त्रैण पुरुषने लिखा है या प्रक्षिप्त है तो दोनों हाथ जोडकर नमस्कार है उस धूर्त शिरोमणि को।
!!मातेव गरीयसी!!
!!जय जय सीताराम!!
स्वामिराघवेन्द्रदास: स्वर्गाश्रम: ओपन / कमेंट