Get Mystery Box with random crypto!

सुधर्मा Sudharma

टेलीग्राम चैनल का लोगो sudharma_108 — सुधर्मा Sudharma
टेलीग्राम चैनल का लोगो sudharma_108 — सुधर्मा Sudharma
चैनल का पता: @sudharma_108
श्रेणियाँ: धर्म
भाषा: हिंदी
ग्राहकों: 838
चैनल से विवरण

DharmikEducation●Vedas●Sanskrit●Temple●Dharma●History● Culture
Instagram👉 www.instagram.com/Sudharma_108
#सनातन_विद्या
#Sanatan_Dharma

Ratings & Reviews

4.50

2 reviews

Reviews can be left only by registered users. All reviews are moderated by admins.

5 stars

1

4 stars

1

3 stars

0

2 stars

0

1 stars

0


नवीनतम संदेश 2

2021-08-15 18:46:12
तुलसीदासजी का दर्शन (philosophy)
207 views15:46
ओपन / कमेंट
2021-08-08 19:58:00 Inclusiveness is the Nature of Bhakti. And it included giving Mantras to all castes and even Mlechhas are eligible to worship Bhagavan. There is no stopping Anyone.

Moksha through Jnanamarga is only open to Brahmanas, but Moksha through Vaishnava Pancharatra Shastras, Ramayana, Mahabharata, Bhagavata Purana etc is Universal. Books where written to explain the crux of thr Upanishads and the Secrets of the Upanishads where elaborated within them withou quoting the Vedas hence making them Universally accessible.

Bhagavata-Shreshthas like Suradasa ji Tulasidasaji Ashtachhapa Bhakta Kavis of Vallabha Pushti Bhakti, Hita Harivamsha ji, Alwar Sants, Annamacharya, Ramadasu ji, Nrisimha Mehta ji, Tukarama ji, Ravidasa ji etc wrote the Essence of Bhakti, the Crux of all Vedas and Vedantic Philosophical concepts in Local languages and made Brahma-jnana easily accessible by All.

Bhakti they proved is the main intent of Upanishads, its not Jnana not Karma, it is how भागवत says ज्ञानवैराग्ययुक्तया श्रुतिगृहीतया भक्त्या (while using सहयुक्तेप्रधाने अप्रधानतृतीया) such Bhakti known through Shruti, where Jnana and Vairagya are Parts
Will give Biggest fruit which is भगवत्-साक्षात्कार (appearance of Hari).

They did not make any reforms or ammendments in Vedas. They revived the Bhakti Which had becomes less popular. And where people where being deluded by delusional philosophies spread in the name of Jnanamarga, Acharyas like Vallabhacharya enlightened the world by Showing the Real Jnana-marga of the True Sankhya-yoga (jnana-yoga) expounded by Maharshi Kapiladeva.

It was Marxists who started using Bhakti Sants and show them as Anti-Vedas, or such people who made changes or ammendments in Vedas. Their purpose was to crrate divide in minds of Hindus and misguide them from Vedic Dharma and teach them Avedic Liberalism in the name of Bhakti.

Kabridasji was never secular. Tulasidasji was completely Brahmanical even though he showed Rama hugging the Nishada. Surdasji wrote how Rama ate the eaten fruits of Shabari, still their was no intent to Seculaize or Liberalize or Reform Dharma.

Reform means the idea that Vedic Dharma was of oldage. Now new rules should come. And hence they spread lies about Dharma to be flexible and Smritis to undergo changes. "Change" itself is Marxist Propoganda. Kabirdasji was student of Ramanandacharya and never said those secular things. All these verses are added later.

Beware of Marxist Propoganda fed to you in the name of Bhakti Movement. Bhakti Movement did happen but was not Reformist and Anti-Brahmanical. It was definitely All-Inclusive. and even the lower class Sants like Tukaramji Ravidasji have written about how Vedic Dharma is only True and Brahmanas are hailed by each! Bhakti is Hailed by the Vedas to be the Only way to reach the Highest Gati. Then why show it as Anti-Vedic/Reformist? Bhakti out of 3 ways to Reach Bhagavan is the Highest way.

Follow @Sudharma_108
121 viewsedited  16:58
ओपन / कमेंट
2021-08-08 19:43:14
Why 'Bhakti Movement' is Marxist Propoganda

Marxist Propgandists have shown Vaishnava Acharyas and Sants as some Reformists who tried to dilute the Brahmanical and Vedic Hinduism.

Vedas are the root if Hinduism, and the Sole Duty of Preaching Vedas is only to Brahmanas, it is not a right, it is a Duty which has been laid upon them by Paramatma itself and they're supposed to learn and teach Vedas since birth.

Vaishnava Acharyas like Ramanuja are considered to be the ones to start the Bhakti Movement.

It is definitely true that Ramanujacharya revived and popularized Bhakti again among the masses. But he has not opposed anything of the Vedas. Pashubali has not been opposed, He did not allow Shudras to read Vedas, and what he did was He showed how Shastras are not granting Moksha only to Brahmanas, which was the previous misconception.

Entry into temples which did not violate Vedic Norms was popularized and promoted.
134 views16:43
ओपन / कमेंट
2021-08-06 11:52:29 सुधर्मा Sudharma pinned «*My Brother Is Fighting For His Life and We Need Your Support To Save Him* Hi, My name is Neeraj and I am raising funds for my elder brother, Dharmender Nebhnani. The family has done all it can to collect the total amount required for the treatment but Rs.…»
08:52
ओपन / कमेंट
2021-07-31 20:10:40 *My Brother Is Fighting For His Life and We Need Your Support To Save Him*

Hi, My name is Neeraj and I am raising funds for my elder brother, Dharmender Nebhnani. The family has done all it can to collect the total amount required for the treatment but Rs. 1,85,000 more is required to pay for all the medical expenses.

He has lot of post Covid complications. Lot of breathing trouble and dental abscess. His 4 upper and 3 lower tooths have got pus and gives him lot of pain in speaking or chewing anything. Doctor has told to do immediate treatment for it but we don't have any money left for treatment. Need your Urgent help for his treatment and saving him from getting BLACK FUNGUS.


For Contributing you can Use My Google Pay, Paytm, Phonepe Number +91 7982719540

PS = All docs and proofs can be found in his stories
https://instagram.com/unexplored_bharat?utm_medium=copy_link
99 views17:10
ओपन / कमेंट
2021-07-31 20:10:14
Please Save This Man's Life

His Message

.
99 views17:10
ओपन / कमेंट
2021-07-29 18:33:44 Brahm also is the same Tattva called Ishvara. But he is just defined differently.

Brahm is defined as Satchidanand (Absolute existence, Conciusness and Bliss) which will be explained in some other post. This Satchidananda Nature is also lacking within God Allah Yahveh etc. God isnt Absolute Existence isnt Pure Conciousness and even if we accept the above 2 Aananda can never be a part of a Cruel God where There is no Concept of Leela.

Follow @Sudharma_108
324 views15:33
ओपन / कमेंट
2021-07-29 18:33:09 Ishvara Brahm Purushottama God Allah are the Same?

Ishvara means one who has Controlership over Entire Universe. Ishvara is Allknowing and He is Cause of Birth Staying and Dissolution of Universe/s. Ishvara is only 1.

God does not mean Ishvara even though it sounds similar. God means Devata or Diety. God comes from the Sanskrit word हुत, Hu means to sacrifice. The one whom the sacrificial offerings reach are हुत, the word change slowly to Ghut and then to God. This word is of Germanic Origin and entered English. All Pagans who sacrified to these special governing forces where hence called Hutas or Gods.

Deva means to Shine or Play. There are 10 meanings assigned as per Sanskrit Grammar but the meaning which was adopted by Western Pagans was of Luminosity. Since the sky shines it is called Div in Sanskrit which changes to Dyaus by a rule दिव उत्. Since the Dieties are Shining they started being called Devas (from) Div and Dios in Latin again from the common root Div.

Devatas where not considered as Supreme Beings who controlled entire Universe but they controlled only some specific function, like controllership of Sea was with Varuna here and Poseidon there. In the West there was no Common Origin to all these Dieties hence they are Polytheistic.

But we have another Diety called by names Mahavishnu, Vasudeva, Narayana in his Purusha form who gives rise to all other Dieties. देवा नारायणाङ्गजाः (Bhagavata = all Devas rise through parts of Narayana). This is the Viraat Purusha form which Krishna shows, where all Dieties are as Parts of His body and He himself is the Ishvara using these forces to control individual aspects of the Universe.

God in Christianity and Islam is 1 single Diety which controls the Universe. He is a Diety. Don't confuse him with Ishvara or Brahm. Ishvara is Also a Diety.
But there are alot of Specialities in Ishvara lacking in any of the Avedic Thoughts.

Allah is not Omnipresent. Ishvara is. God/Yahveh has various beliefs of its Omnipresence within Christian/Jewish schools. Both are not Omnipotent, they are bound by their own nature in terms of decision making etc. They cannot a forgive a sinner who worships someone else, they lack Compassion and are Partial. वैषम्य-नैर्घृण्य.

Their God or Allah is Ethical whereas ours is Meta-Ethical (Beyond Ethics). The word of God is Ethics here, and if God makes a rule he cannot break it. The Redemption of souls is also based on their Ethics (code set by God).

Whereas our Ishvara is beyond anything like Ethics, He follows Dharma only by will for Loka-Sangraha (inspiring others). He does not provide Moksha based on Paapa and Punya but he does that when the Soul has been cleansed of all Ethics and Papa-Punya. As our Ishvara is Meta-Ethical his Moksha also is Meta-Ethical.

There is no concept of Leela in Avedic faiths and even in Avedic Anarya Namaj types. Hence their God and Allah have the stain of Vaishamya and Nairghrinya (partiality and cruelty). The God provides free-will to souls, He then puts those who worship Him into Heaven and those who dont into Hell.

Ishvara is free from all this. Ishvara doesn't create for any purpose. All his deeds are juat purposeless divine passtimes. As Time is cyclical and beginningless, the previous Karmas decide the fate of individual souls and Ishvara is Kevala (unattached) to all Wordly Material Stuff.

Bhagavan is an aspect of Ishvara. Bhaga are six qualities called = Aishwarya (all-Controlership and opulence), Veerya (Valour), Yashas (Glory), Shree (Splendour), Jnana (Knowledge of All) and Vairagya (Unattachedment). Such qualities are also present in certain Humans and Devas hence we refer to them as Bhagavan Indra etc.

But all 6 are A) Infinitely Prsent B) Present all the time C) Are Natural Qualities not Acquired in only 1 Ishvara. Who is Undoubtedly Krishna/Narayana. कृष्णस्तु भगवान् स्वयम्। Other Dieties have these qualities in limited amount, and are acquired not natural, acquired or borrowed from Krishna.
330 views15:33
ओपन / कमेंट
2021-07-29 18:33:02
Are Ishvara Allah God all the same?
312 views15:33
ओपन / कमेंट
2021-07-26 18:38:55 Is channel par puri Gita available hai.

Jarur dekhe

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQF4f1EFj7fq2ypKOmXsODV4vjLBcbxow
175 views15:38
ओपन / कमेंट