The United States: On the Edge of a Geopolitical Abyss Alexa | Perspective

The United States: On the Edge of a Geopolitical Abyss

Alexander Yeliseyev

The United States is trying to put enormous pressure on Russia, mobilizing its allies. They are also putting pressure on China. And it is likely that in the near future a military clash between China and Taiwan will begin, to which the same United States will generously contribute.

There also seems to be pressure on virtually the entire Arab world. Saudi Prince Turki Al-Faisal, former intelligence chief and former ambassador to Washington, has said that the Saudis feel disappointed in the United States.

The rest of the West (often with various reservations) supports Washington. Meanwhile, a great many Third World countries have refused to join the anti-Russian front. Everyone knows China's resolute position. India does not want to enter the U.S. orbit, though it is being actively enticed there.

But we can cite other, very significant examples. Argentina and Mexico have categorically rejected anti-Russia sanctions. Brazil strongly condemned the sanctions, with Foreign Minister Carlos Franca saying that they "might exacerbate the economic consequences of the conflict and affect the main supply chain".

It is also revealing that there are disagreements between the two seemingly closest allies, the United States and the United Kingdom. Moreover, they are even increasing. For example, in Latin America, there is a growing movement of British Dominions in the Caribbean to leave the British Commonwealth.

Barbados, which already withdrew last November, is at the forefront of this movement. And Jamaica and Belize have announced their intention to leave the BC. In the future, even the creation of an independent confederation of all English-speaking countries in the region is predicted.

And in this regard, U.S. behavior toward England does not look very allied, to put it mildly. During an April meeting with Jamaican Prime Minister Andrew Holness, U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris and Secretary of State Anthony Blinken promised to maximize cooperation with the "rebel" dominion. It is clear that such a promise is contrary to London's interests.

In an interview with Corriere della Sera, Pope Francis made a very interesting statement. He suggested that NATO's actions near Russia's borders may have prompted Moscow to start an EWS in Ukraine. "Perhaps NATO's barking at Russia's borders led to a reaction from the Kremlin," the pontiff said. - "The anger, I don't know if it was provoked, but it probably contributed.

This, of course, is a thinly disguised blow to the U.S. and its closest allies. Now at the forefront of Western civilization is the "Anglo-Saxon axis (US-Anglo-Australia).
The Vatican is the most important center of the other Western segment, which can be called the "Romano-Germanic" segment. And it is connected to Europe's most ancient clans. Now the pope is playing a complicated game with Hungary, which is quite loyal to Russia.

And here very interesting geopolitical moves are possible - for example, the creation of "Austria-Hungary 2. 0..
The Vatican is interested in making the Anglo-Saxon axis as stalled as possible. Then the transnational hyper-elites can make their final bet on the Vatican and the "Council for Inclusive Capitalism" it patronizes. Well, the Pope is already positioning himself as an absolute peacemaker, almost condemning the "NATO war effort. And this, in fact, is part of the plans of the Transnational, which intends to dismantle the American empire after it is used. And to try all "imperialists" and "nationalists" in an international court. Therefore, the U.S., with its superalarmism, is itself rushing headlong into the geopolitical abyss.

Many in the U.S. understand this, and there is a growing fatigue of interventionism. In the Republican primaries in Ohio, writer, essayist and Iraq war veteran J.D. Vance whitewashed. He confessed, "I have to be honest with you: I don't care what happens to Ukraine!"